From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:58:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86k5re4blv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291531.l7TFVnlD010335@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86fy224aah.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86bqcq4a4q.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291604.l7TG4atk011108@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <867ine492x.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <863ay24826.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291641.l7TGfo2t012413@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200708310812.l7V8Cgq9022040@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86lkbnygii.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <46DC1EF6.1040002@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188946977 12346 80.91.229.12 (4 Sep 2007 23:02:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 23:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yavor@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 05 01:02:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IShQ8-0001Mw-SQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:02:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IShQ7-0001gC-Iw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:02:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IShLi-0005k6-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IShLg-0005hr-J2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IShLg-0005hb-Dn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:58:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IShLg-0000jr-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:58:20 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IShLQ-0002j7-7C; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:58:04 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:54:45 +0900) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77789 Archived-At: > Does it compile and work on GNUstep? (I don't care about MuckOS at > all.) No. That's why I said "Carbon+AppKit port" (requires Carbon) in contrast to the Cocoa/GNUstep port. A port that supports GNUstep is much better than one which doesn't. So unless we want to support both, we should prefer the Cocoa/GNUstep port.