From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.cc-mode.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compilation order. Help with makefiles, please! Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:06:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188619615 16182 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2007 04:06:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 04:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, alan.mackenzie_jwa@nxp.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Alan Mackenzie_JWA Original-X-From: cc-mode-help-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Sat Sep 01 06:06:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: sf-cc-mode-help@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.225]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IRKG3-00059N-SV for sf-cc-mode-help@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:06:52 +0200 Original-Received: from sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net (sc8-sf-list1-new-b.sourceforge.net [10.3.1.93]) by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E686C12829; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRKG1-000751-Fx for cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:06:49 -0700 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1IRKG1-0006r6-26 for cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:06:49 -0700 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRKFn-0007YM-50; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:06:35 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Alan Mackenzie_JWA on Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:57:38 +0200) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 X-BeenThere: cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports, feature requests, and general talk about CC Mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: cc-mode-help-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: cc-mode-help-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.cc-mode.general:4720 gmane.emacs.devel:77524 Archived-At: > That is quite different from `require', and I don't think we should > change `require' to do that. But we could add it as a separate new > feature, perhaps called `compilation-require'. > What do you think about that? cc-bytecomp implements this sort of thing. Possibly its functionality could be absorbed into Emacs 23. It sounds like you're saying that this approach would work as a solution. What do others think of it? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/