From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Patch: prefer-window-split-horizontally
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:42:04 -0400
Message-ID: <E1ILVJE-0005sq-EE@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87bqdajcr1.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <87vebij5p8.fsf@jurta.org>
	<jwvvebgzjfn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <877inwjr7y.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187231952 13486 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2007 02:39:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:39:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: tassilo@member.fsf.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 16 04:39:10 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ILVGP-0003xI-QL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 04:39:10 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ILVGO-0005Hd-Rg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:39:08 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ILVFp-0004hd-KV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:38:33 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ILVFm-0004di-Oe
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:38:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILVFm-0004dU-FR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:38:30 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1ILVFi-0003AZ-Kd; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:38:26 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1ILVJE-0005sq-EE; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:42:04 -0400
In-reply-to: <877inwjr7y.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 16
	Aug 2007 02:36:57 +0300)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76610
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/76610>

    There was an idea to rewrite the whole `display-buffer' in Lisp, and make
    it more customizable.  But it seems it is impossible to rewrite it
    completely, because the current C implementation processes its input
    argument `frame' which isn't given to display-buffer-function:

So what?  How does that stop us from replacing the C code with Lisp code?