From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus-summary-catchup turns ticked into unread Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:28:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20070702160929.C21251C8115@galatea.esat.kuleuven.be> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187051246 10829 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2007 00:27:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 14 02:27:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IKkFn-0008Jc-QM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:27:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKkFn-0000VZ-9P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:27:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKkDh-0007pf-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IKkDh-0007pI-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKkDg-0007pD-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IKkDg-00054n-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IKkH1-000386-2S; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:28:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Katsumi Yamaoka on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:03:56 +0900) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76486 Archived-At: [I sent this message a week ago but did not get a response. Could we get the discussion moving again?] The function definition for the XEmacs version of pop-to-buffer is as follows. There's no difference between XEmacs 21.4 and 21.5. The optional ON-FRAME is boolean, so there seems no way to keep the compatibility. (defun pop-to-buffer (bufname &optional not-this-window-p on-frame) ... If optional third arg is non-nil, it is the frame to pop to this buffer on. I am sure that few callers pass the argument NORECORD to pop-to-buffer. So I think an incompatible change would be ok, adding the ON-FRAME argument before NORECORD. What do others think?