From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: merge emacs-pretest-bug and emacs-devel
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:56:08 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IKHfc-0004Mz-Ih@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BNELLINCGFJLDJIKDGACIEFJCBAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<E1IJjAW-00037y-1I@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<14wsw1bfmq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186941225 17405 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2007 17:53:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:53:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 12 19:53:34 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IKHd6-0004Zl-FH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:53:32 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IKHd6-0004NY-4T
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:53:32 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IKHcS-0003wc-6r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:52:52 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IKHcQ-0003uq-Cl
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:52:51 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IKHcQ-0003uj-8Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:52:50 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IKHcP-0004cM-DB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:52:49 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IKHfc-0004Mz-Ih; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:56:08 -0400
In-reply-to: <14wsw1bfmq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:23:09 -0400)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76383
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/76383>

    Obviously you think the two lists are different

They certainly ARE different, at present.  The question about which I
have no opinion is whether to merge them.

    I propose making emacs-pretest-bug an alias for emacs-devel in a week
    or so, if there are no objections in that time.

Ok, I will ask for that.

						    I don't know if it's
    worth adding a [Bug] tag to messages that are forwarded in this way?

I don't know if that is feasible; I also don't see why it would help.