From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scratch buffer annoyance Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:05:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <85ejinrqgk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <35917.128.165.123.18.1185998078.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <85vebzq7vd.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87odhqethv.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87zm18v7ug.fsf@jurta.org> <85abt7kck1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87hcndc3zc.fsf@jurta.org> <87643pbqjq.fsf@jurta.org> <85643ppor9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87sl6sbjaw.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186808599 20359 80.91.229.12 (11 Aug 2007 05:03:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 05:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 11 07:03:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IJj88-0001nG-CN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 07:03:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJj87-0004vq-RR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJj78-0003o2-5M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:02:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJj75-0003k0-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:02:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJj75-0003jn-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IJj74-0006Lq-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IJjA9-00033r-Cb; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:05:21 -0400 In-reply-to: <87sl6sbjaw.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:47:03 +0300) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76342 Archived-At: Sorry, I meant `startup-', not `setup-'. I am already too entangled in this naming mess. So let's name this new option with all proposed words `startup-initial-buffer-visit-contents-display-setup'. That's good for the humor file. For actually implementing this, how about `startup-buffer-choice' or `initial-buffer-choice'?