From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem in temp-buffer-resize-mode Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:42:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <18097.25736.3076.918330@kinyarwanda.ccs.neu.edu> <46B1AFC4.2080700@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186098038 9876 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2007 23:40:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eli@barzilay.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 03 01:40:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IGkHT-00029Q-KG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:40:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGkHT-0005uX-6w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:40:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IGkH7-0005f1-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:40:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IGkH6-0005dw-20 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGkH5-0005dl-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IGkH5-00049L-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:40:11 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IGkJS-0002g0-8b; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:42:38 -0400 In-reply-to: <46B1AFC4.2080700@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:19:48 +0200) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75967 Archived-At: Thanks for reporting this bug. In fact a test like (= (frame-width) (window-width)) is used quite frequently in Elisp code and may fail in all these cases just as it did for you. FWIW these tests should be replaced by calling a function `window-full-width-p' (the function `display-buffer' uses to check whether it should split the largest window). Would you like to make these fixes, then ack? They should be fixed in Emacs 22, and will then get transferred to the trunk.