From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs 22.1 hogging CPU Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:17:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200707240510.l6O5AKPK025664@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185315459 26643 80.91.229.12 (24 Jul 2007 22:17:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 25 00:17:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDSh9-000277-6p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:17:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDSh8-0007Cq-N9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IDSfL-0006Kd-Ec for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IDSfK-0006Jr-03 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDSfJ-0006Jm-R8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:15:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IDSfI-0002T1-R3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:15:37 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IDSgt-0006Ep-7B; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:17:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <200707240510.l6O5AKPK025664@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:10:20 -0700) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75493 Archived-At: We would have to support a feature like this until the end of time for something that is not that likely to repeat. "Support" is ambiguous in this context. If it means that we won't delete this feature, I agree, but that is not a problem. We just won't delete it. If it means "continue to change and pay attention to", then I disagree. We won't ever have to change the list, except when we find another case that we want to warn users about. Then we can add that case. So this won't require attention except when it is advantageous for us to pay attention. Would someone please implement this, then ack?