From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scratch buffer annoyance Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:45:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871wf5cv6y.fsf@jurta.org> <7dbe73ed0707190725l426d0731u5f9c36cd14278f78@mail.gmail.com> <87k5st7iqt.fsf@jurta.org> <87sl7ebwtk.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185295642 11872 80.91.229.12 (24 Jul 2007 16:47:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 24 18:47:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDNXc-00062z-Eu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDNXc-0007Rb-3F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:47:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IDNUl-0004HK-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:44:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IDNUj-0004Dx-B1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDNUj-0004Dn-3g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IDNUi-0000Uk-Ls for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IDNWI-0002r7-2b; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:45:58 -0400 In-reply-to: <87sl7ebwtk.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:45:11 +0300) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75463 Archived-At: With the patch it displays both screens on one. The second screen was just 4 additional lines, so information fits perfectly on one screen. That is good. > I don't understand -- what does it mean to "quit" from the splash > screen? "quit" means to kill the buffer with the splash screen. It seems a bit strange to speak of "quitting" in this context. I'll present the combined patch after an agreement on a new customizable option. Is it OK to add `visit-on-startup'? Please do! Should it obsolete `inhibit-splash-screen'? No, I don't think so.