From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: suggestion for C-s (isearch-.*) key-bindings Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:49:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r6n1kfyg.fsf@debby.local.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185068996 19391 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2007 01:49:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dieter Wilhelm Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 22 03:49:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ICQa1-0004pE-Bt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 03:49:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ICQa0-0005n8-TD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ICQYK-0004vP-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ICQYJ-0004ur-CD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ICQYI-0004uj-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ICQYI-0001aJ-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:48:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ICQZd-00033v-Sd; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:49:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <87r6n1kfyg.fsf@debby.local.net> (message from Dieter Wilhelm on Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:07:51 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75273 Archived-At: 1.) | Key | marking | killing | moving | type | |------------+---------+---------+--------+-----------------------| | C-M-y | - | C-d | C-f | char | | C-w | M-@ | M-d | M-f | word | | C-y | - | C-k | C-e | line | |------------+---------+---------+--------+-----------------------| | suggestion | C-M-@ | C-M-d | C-M-f | sexp (sorely missing) | This is terse, so I am not really sure you are proposing. If you are suggesting that we give special search meanings to C-d and C-f and M-d and M-f, we certainly won't do that. Their current meanings, to exit a search, are too useful.