From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Saving the selection before killing Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:54:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5fmk5pF3bo3fbU1@mid.individual.net> <87hco5xtbv.fsf@jurta.org> <868x9f30fo.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <469DDB7C.4090007@swipnet.se> <469F1450.5090002@swipnet.se> <46A055CB.6060003@swipnet.se> <46A0E7DD.40409@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185036781 31993 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2007 16:53:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 16:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 21 18:52:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ICICR-0003nj-AA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:52:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ICICQ-0005ta-Ti for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:52:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ICICN-0005t0-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:52:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ICICN-0005so-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:52:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ICICM-0005sl-Vf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:52:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ICICM-0008GP-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:52:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ICIDf-0003Qw-Mf; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:54:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <46A0E7DD.40409@swipnet.se> (message from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:50:37 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75238 Archived-At: I'm planning to go through the X calls Emacs does to see why 22 is so much slower than 21. I'm sure some optimizations can be done. Thank you! It would be good to do this soon, so we can fix it for Emacs 22.2.