From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bad tool-bar icons in Emacs 22.1 release Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:24:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <466C80A3.1040102@gnu.org> <466D34C5.8050604@gnu.org> <4686267A.8050001@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183436732 26804 80.91.229.12 (3 Jul 2007 04:25:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 04:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: Reiner Steib Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 03 06:25:30 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I5Zx8-0007Oy-Lx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:25:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5Zx8-0005RH-4W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:25:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I5Zw1-0003nW-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:24:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I5Zw0-0003md-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:24:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5Zvz-0003mU-VB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:24:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I5Zvy-0005x1-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:24:15 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I5Zvx-0007dg-Tf; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:24:13 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Reiner Steib on Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:22:31 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74219 Archived-At: Offering different files under the same name (at different dates) leads to confusion. If we'd release "emacs-22.1-bin-i386.zip" _with_ the image DLLs you always have to ask the user when he has downloaded the ZIP file and/or if it includes emacs-22.1/bin/FOO.dll etc. Now I see what you mean, and I agree. (I think this is a GNU standard policy too.)