From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bad tool-bar icons in Emacs 22.1 release Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:47:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <466C80A3.1040102@gnu.org> <466D34C5.8050604@gnu.org> <4686267A.8050001@swipnet.se> <4686F6F9.1070307@gmail.com> <4688111D.6090501@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183405947 32201 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2007 19:52:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, jasonr@gnu.org, Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 02 21:52:25 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I5Rwd-0002on-JD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:52:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5Rwd-0006dw-8w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:52:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I5Rv5-0005gW-GZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I5Rv3-0005fn-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5Rv3-0005fj-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:50:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I5Rus-0005Zk-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:50:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I5Rs1-0006cV-2y; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:47:37 -0400 In-reply-to: <4688111D.6090501@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74195 Archived-At: > No, because every additional step needed for installation tends > to discourage a certain fraction of people from even trying. Is not that a good argument for including them in the binaries then? It is an argument in favor of that. But people say that would be a pain for other reasons. So maybe this is the best compromise.