From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp: Re: emacs-22.1 with GTK dumps core when Gnome wigets clicked] Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:48:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <467A4F49.9040906@swipnet.se> <0B83D28B-95EF-4022-B447-63EA6BB3792E@raeburn.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182898127 1392 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2007 22:48:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 27 00:48:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I3Jpw-0003tH-Gb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:48:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3Jpw-0006fn-4l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I3Jph-0006Zy-FP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:48:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I3Jpf-0006Z8-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:48:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3Jpf-0006Z3-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I3Jpf-0004fu-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I3Jpe-0002Y9-MO; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:48:22 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:45:34 +0900) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73889 Archived-At: Thank you. As for the issue on the hook variables such as __malloc_hook, it will work at least as well as glibc malloc. But neither is correct in a strict sense. In practice, it is not crucial that this code be formally correct. It is enough that it operate correctly on the platforms it is used on. There are not very many modern platforms any more, and some of them don't use gmalloc. Would people like to check the modern platforms and verify that there is not really any problem?