From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Post-22.1 development? Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:22:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200706101559.l5AFxBFb006829@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86fy4yg62v.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <466ED07F.9000002@gnu.org> <85fy4wx1tb.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181751935 16768 80.91.229.12 (13 Jun 2007 16:25:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 13 18:25:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HyVf0-0002lR-AU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:25:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyVez-0003Lf-NX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyVbi-00021q-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyVbi-00021Y-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyVbh-00021T-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HyVbh-0003p6-GZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HyVbg-0001Yj-Ty; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:22:04 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:09:11 -0400) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72775 Archived-At: Actually, the value of TERM is only for internal use and should never be passed on to subprocesses, so its presence in process-environment is not important. That is true, in a sense. However, at present the primitives to create subprocesses just pass TERM along to the subprocess. Thus, it is up to the Lisp code to set it. Should this work differently? Should we do something in call-process and start-process to set TERM?