From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Post-22.1 development?
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:44:05 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HxgRR-0008I9-BW@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1HvFf7-00083b-En@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200706101559.l5AFxBFb006829@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181555147 3779 80.91.229.12 (11 Jun 2007 09:45:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:45:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 11 11:45:46 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HxgT0-0001e3-CF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:45:42 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HxgSz-0003dk-8H
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:45:41 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HxgRT-0002RF-Lp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:44:07 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HxgRS-0002QC-Ii
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:44:06 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxgRS-0002Q7-Ci
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:44:06 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HxgRS-0001RL-0A
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:44:06 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HxgRR-0008I9-BW; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:44:05 -0400
In-reply-to: <200706101559.l5AFxBFb006829@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message
	from Dan Nicolaescu on Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:59:03 -0700)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72613
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/72613>

    How about merging the multi-tty branch? The changes on that branch are
    much more localized, so porting fixes from the trunk to the EMACS_22
    branch should not be a big issue. 

Does anyone see a problem with this idea?