From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?]
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:18:56 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HxNJo-0005gj-0H@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com>	<ud50bv7gz.fsf@gnu.org>	<E1HvRQF-0003vM-2N@fencepost.gnu.org>	<864plnorgn.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>	<u7iqiuqhj.fsf@gnu.org>	<85ps4ap0kh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>	<E1Hvyqd-0003Je-BI@fencepost.gnu.org>	<18023.8888.790251.607253@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>	<4667AAD8.5040502@swipnet.se>	<18024.20333.913034.347754@localhost.localdomain>	<4668EF09.9020405@swipnet.se>	<87ps46zziq.fsf_-_@ambire.localdomain>
	<466966E4.2080405@ig.com.br>
	<E1HwxWO-0005oE-7k@fencepost.gnu.org> <466B743D.509@ig.com.br>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181481674 30907 80.91.229.12 (10 Jun 2007 13:21:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:21:14 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ttn@gnuvola.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Vinicius Jose Latorre <viniciusjl@ig.com.br>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 10 15:21:13 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HxNM0-0007vH-NC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:21:12 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HxNM0-00044i-3w
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:21:12 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HxNJq-0002MH-Hh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:18:58 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HxNJo-0002KV-UB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:18:58 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HxNJo-0002KB-FZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:18:56 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HxNJo-00063A-IZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:18:56 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HxNJo-0005gj-0H; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:18:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <466B743D.509@ig.com.br> (message from Vinicius Jose Latorre on
	Sun, 10 Jun 2007 00:47:09 -0300)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72568
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/72568>

What advantage is there in making Emacs use IPP directly,
rather than using lpr?