From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)? (was: Re: Post-22.1 development?)
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:32 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HvRQC-0003v0-B9@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1HvFf7-00083b-En@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200706041853.l54IrLXb006451@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181020801 9379 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2007 05:20:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:20:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 05 07:20:00 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HvRSa-000111-1o
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:20:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRSY-0006f1-Gg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:19:58 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRQm-0004IH-Db
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:18:08 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRQl-0004H3-9g
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:18:07 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvRQl-0004GT-2z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:18:07 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HvRQk-0000FD-8v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:18:06 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HvRQC-0003v0-B9; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:32 -0400
In-reply-to: <200706041853.l54IrLXb006451@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message
	from Dan Nicolaescu on Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:53:17 -0700)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72260
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/72260>

    Do you still plan to turn over Emacs maintenance to someone else? 

I would still like to do so.

    Have you made a decision on who is going to be the new Emacs
    maintainer(s)?

I have not made a plan.