From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Post-22.1 development?
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:02 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HvRPi-0003qQ-Rw@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com>	<E1HvFf7-00083b-En@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<856463sehn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <466481AF.5050507@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181020706 9208 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2007 05:18:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 05:18:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 05 07:18:25 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HvRR0-0000pK-Nx
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 07:18:23 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRQz-0004Xe-7U
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:18:21 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRQK-0003mz-7x
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:40 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HvRQJ-0003md-Ho
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvRQJ-0003mY-Cm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:39 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HvRQI-00008D-Sv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:38 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HvRPi-0003qQ-Rw; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <466481AF.5050507@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Mon, 04
	Jun 2007 22:18:39 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72257
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/72257>

    I agree that 2 months is too long to wait. We should merge any changes
    from the trunk that were intended for Emacs 22.2 ASAP, then any future
    changes targeted for 22.2 should be made in the EMACS_22_BASE branch and
    merged to the trunk, not the other way around.

This is a good plan, but I am not convinced that it is enough reason
to rush to merge unicode-2 into the trunk.