From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS is the `released version' Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:29:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86646mjvxp.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <2cd46e7f0705251413y975af0bwbd7c6709814fd915@mail.gmail.com> <85wsywysob.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <871wh02d0d.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wsyr1yte.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87veeb1pwy.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <853b1fxpbh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180805499 2435 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2007 17:31:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 17:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: joakim@verona.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 02 19:31:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HuXRu-0004BP-KM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:31:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HuXRu-0000Fk-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:31:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HuXQX-0007Hn-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HuXQW-0007HC-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HuXQW-0007H7-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HuXQW-0000qI-0U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HuXQD-00012r-Fs; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:29:49 -0400 In-reply-to: (joakim@verona.se) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72062 Archived-At: - If a package author doesnt want to sign papers, why would he ever do it? To get the program included in Emacs. - For a package to be included in Emacs is an honor, and there is really no other reason, that I can see, to try to get ones package included. I think the main reason is the desire for all the Emacs users to get the code easily.