From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Please don't lose the patch in configure
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 06:55:17 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HrAyT-0003bu-S4@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1Hqw0T-00086O-KC@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jek5uzfaiv.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180004166 7749 80.91.229.12 (24 May 2007 10:56:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:56:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 24 12:56:02 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HrAzB-0000MC-4y
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 12:56:01 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HrAzD-0002qt-OK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 06:56:03 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HrAyd-0002cQ-DR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 06:55:27 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HrAyc-0002bW-LH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 06:55:26 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrAyb-0002bM-Ts
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 06:55:26 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HrAyb-0002y4-DF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 06:55:25 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HrAyT-0003bu-S4; Thu, 24 May 2007 06:55:17 -0400
In-reply-to: <jek5uzfaiv.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on
	Thu, 24 May 2007 00:19:36 +0200)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71723
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/71723>

    Since configure has to be regenerated for release anyway it does not
    matter at all.

Why does it have to be regenerated for release?