From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: EOL conversion of files in .tar archives
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:52:37 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HqVj3-0001ZI-9q@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <u1whb5m6p.fsf@gnu.org> <E1Hpzoi-0001mB-Vh@etlken.m17n.org>
	<ufy5plxbs.fsf@gnu.org> <87hcq5bx8k.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179845779 20801 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2007 14:56:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 22 16:56:16 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HqVmZ-00018f-Qy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 16:56:15 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HqVma-0005yl-NV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 10:56:16 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HqVj9-0002eb-QZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 10:52:43 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HqVj8-0002cs-SQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 10:52:43 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HqVj8-0002cY-N5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 10:52:42 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HqVj8-0005TK-Eq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 May 2007 10:52:42 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HqVj3-0001ZI-9q; Tue, 22 May 2007 10:52:37 -0400
In-reply-to: <87hcq5bx8k.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Mon, 21 May 2007 18:58:03 -0400)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71607
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/71607>

    Why? This behavior has been present since before the pretest, and no
    one complained; this suggests it is not urgent.

Just because the pretesters didn't see a bug during 6 months
doesn't mean it isn't a serious bug.