From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS is the `released version' Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:05:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2cd46e7f0705101124r72000f78xdf05d18ca815ca57@mail.gmail.com> <17991.47259.210100.801472@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179680809 31383 80.91.229.12 (20 May 2007 17:06:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 17:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tromey@redhat.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 20 19:06:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hporl-0006I1-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 19:06:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hpork-0000Uq-9f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 13:06:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hpoqf-0007Uk-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 13:05:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hpoqd-0007Sv-US for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 13:05:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hpoqd-0007SU-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 13:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hpoqd-0005ZN-43 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 13:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HpoqP-0004LY-VX; Sun, 20 May 2007 13:05:21 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Tom Tromey on Sat, 19 May 2007 16:31:11 -0600) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71433 Archived-At: It seems wasteful to have a file just for this define-package. Why not get the info out of the .el files just as for a one-file package? It could look at all the .el files and verify that they all agree. If they don't, it could print an error message. If it finds different package names in various files, it could treat them as separate packages. I think this would in most cases simplify the packaging.