From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: We can use python.el Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 21:39:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <873b22nd3f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iraxtzkm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87abw961jm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <5kfy61cxjl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4648211C.7080107@gnu.org> <87sl9zo3o3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87veeu6usj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179279792 19369 80.91.229.12 (16 May 2007 01:43:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 01:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 16 03:43:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ho8Xm-0004qd-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 03:43:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho8fh-00086v-CW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 21:51:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho8f9-0007dG-Ot for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 21:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho8f8-0007c7-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 21:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho8f8-0007bt-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 21:50:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ho8XC-00078O-C7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 21:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ho8UB-0001Ne-Nd; Tue, 15 May 2007 21:39:27 -0400 In-reply-to: <87veeu6usj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Tue, 15 May 2007 10:11:40 -0400) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71131 Archived-At: > People seemed to complain that your fix caused a disastrous problem. > What is the state of that? Is the original bug fixed now? > Is the subsequent bug fixed now? I'm still looking at it. What is the current state of the code in EMACS_22_BASE? Is the fix in or out?