From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: We can use python.el Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 04:08:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <873b22nd3f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iraxtzkm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87abw961jm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <5kfy61cxjl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179130374 29305 80.91.229.12 (14 May 2007 08:12:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 08:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 14 10:12:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HnVfk-000141-MF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 10:12:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnVnT-0000dn-Un for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 04:20:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HnVmg-0008VM-OM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 04:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HnVmf-0008US-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 04:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HnVmf-0008UO-Oc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 04:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HnVeu-0001Wp-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 04:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HnVbp-0008HQ-6i; Mon, 14 May 2007 04:08:45 -0400 In-reply-to: <5kfy61cxjl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on Sat, 12 May 2007 21:38:54 -0400) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71003 Archived-At: Shouldn't PBM_MONO benefit from the same kind of check? Ie, move the check to just after init_color_table, before the if block. Is there a bug in the case of PBM_MONO? If so, I guess we should fix it too. But we could also leave it alone, to be conservative.