From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Multi-tty design (Re: Reordering etc/NEWS) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:52:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87fy65k6eh.fsf@red-bean.com> <853b25lk43.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87sla5iqhs.fsf@red-bean.com> <85sla5k4py.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <4642C8C9.5050804@gnu.org> <86tzul15ky.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <4642E388.9010503@gnu.org> <86odktypii.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86k5vhyoo8.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <4644FBFC.6090903@lorentey.hu> <85ejlmh402.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <4645AE8D.8080004@lorentey.hu> <85r6pmcgj2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179006968 13231 80.91.229.12 (12 May 2007 21:56:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 21:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: karoly@lorentey.hu, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 12 23:56:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HmzZI-0000BK-P2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 23:56:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hmzgr-0001T6-Po for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 18:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HmzgQ-00019n-Sd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 18:03:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HmzgQ-00018s-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 18:03:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmzgP-00018d-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 18:03:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HmzYp-00014a-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 17:55:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HmzVf-00006b-Ic; Sat, 12 May 2007 17:52:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <85r6pmcgj2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Sat, 12 May 2007 15:34:09 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70926 Archived-At: If there is no way to contact Emacs anymore, that would seem like a sensible default once Emacs is idling. Just closing the connections and frames should not immediately cause an exit, not while a Lisp program is still running. However, if Emacs has no net connections and no frames, and returns to the main loop, perhaps then it should exit.