From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: man page not found Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:05:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8966117.30111178707835728.JavaMail.www@wwinf4102> <874pmm6yxz.fsf@lrde.org> <87zm4e5jo4.fsf@lrde.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178802510 27214 80.91.229.12 (10 May 2007 13:08:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alinsoar@voila.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: michael@cadilhac.name (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 10 15:08:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hm8Nf-00079m-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 15:08:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8Uy-0003Ej-Tz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:16:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8Uu-0003EO-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8Ut-0003E4-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hm8Ut-0003E1-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hm8NZ-0002wG-SW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:08:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hm8Ke-0002U9-Vq; Thu, 10 May 2007 09:05:21 -0400 In-reply-to: <87zm4e5jo4.fsf@lrde.org> (michael@cadilhac.name) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70754 Archived-At: Your patch is not bad, but it might be better to fix the code that checks for a link. After all, there are lots of ways to move point to the end of the buffer, and if it looks like there should be a link there, why not make it work as a link?