From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A prototype of intelligent replace for Emacs Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 18:26:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178490604 6361 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2007 22:30:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Herbert Euler" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 07 00:30:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HkpEv-0002mT-RK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 00:30:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkpLp-0004tb-FU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 18:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HkpKy-0004aB-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 18:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HkpKy-0004Zl-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 18:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkpKx-0004ZZ-MP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 18:36:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HkpE3-0003HJ-67 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 18:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HkpBD-0001k5-8R; Sun, 06 May 2007 18:26:11 -0400 In-reply-to: (herberteuler@hotmail.com) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70603 Archived-At: It is Ok for me that a "match" includes features as well, but "match" is not a good term for this purpose, since "match" is already used to indicate matches without features in Emacs. Don't worry about it. Using that meaning for "match" in this file is fine if you explain it clearly. This is true. Then should I use the word "class" in the source code, and use the term "class of like matches" in the document? That is good.