From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: minor observations on Mac build of 22.0.99
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:10:21 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Hie4b-0002Bp-MS@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <914DA7BD-35E5-45AC-BC42-38FA55FBBA60@raeburn.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177971497 7543 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2007 22:18:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:18:17 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 01 00:18:12 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HieCB-0005QP-GN
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 00:18:11 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HieIP-00067v-EM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:24:37 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HieDa-0002Ku-8g
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:19:38 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HieDZ-0002JO-JX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:19:37 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HieDZ-0002J3-Ew
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:19:37 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1Hie7K-0003JL-Du
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:13:10 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1Hie4b-0002Bp-MS; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:10:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <914DA7BD-35E5-45AC-BC42-38FA55FBBA60@raeburn.org> (message from
	Ken Raeburn on Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:56:43 -0400)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70431
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/70431>

    Are these files in fact going to be identical aside from the date  
    stamp in all builds?  If so, perhaps like the .elc files in the lisp  
    tree they should be pre-generated for the release and pretest  
    distributions.

They definitely should be.  I did not realize this was not already the
case.  Can someone please fix this and ack?