From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22 branch created. Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:06:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871wi9jw37.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <462E7B94.3000008@gnu.org> <462F0A07.50104@gnu.org> <864pn4an8j.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86zm4w97du.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <20070425195026.GA19472@printf.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177733382 16683 80.91.229.12 (28 Apr 2007 04:09:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: henrik.enberg@telia.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 28 06:09:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HheFe-0008Vr-LI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:09:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HheLZ-0003yc-Cz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:15:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HheLV-0003uz-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:15:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HheLT-0003un-Vy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HheLT-0003uk-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HheFY-0007Dr-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HheCs-0000yu-Fc; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:06:46 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:32:13 +0300) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70297 Archived-At: > Or it would mean decoding it in a separate buffer, which has > its own big inconveniences. What are they? C-x b RMAIL RET stops working, for one thing. That in itself is a pain in the neck. > I think it should decode a message when it is first visited (and the > extra header that Rmail saves data in is constructed). And then what? how do you store the decoded message so that it is still in mbox format? I do not see the issue. The file is always in mbox format. Decoding the message contents doesn't alter the overall file format.