From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: REDO ?
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:21:12 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HfzPk-0004fI-8J@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <32936604.5441177185299552.JavaMail.www@wwinf4104>
	<jwvabwz7t85.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177338350 18834 80.91.229.12 (23 Apr 2007 14:25:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:25:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: alinsoar@voila.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 23 16:25:43 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HfzTy-0001Cy-7S
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:25:35 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfzZH-0006Zb-1P
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:31:03 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfzXk-0005qf-RV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:29:28 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfzXk-0005q3-DP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:29:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfzXk-0005pr-6H
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:29:28 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HfzSK-00061V-GE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:23:52 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HfzPk-0004fI-8J; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:21:12 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwvabwz7t85.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:57:49 -0400)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69857
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/69857>

I think it is a bad idea to have a separate redo command,
simply because there is no room on the keyboard for a
convenient one, and an inconvenient one won't do much good.