From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: [Stephen.Berman@gmx.net: Re: redisplay] Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:48:15 -0400 Message-ID: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177300410 29480 80.91.229.12 (23 Apr 2007 03:53:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:53:30 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 23 05:53:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HfpcG-0001wk-GY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:53:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hfphc-0007xX-C3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hfpf9-0006MW-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hfpf9-0006M9-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hfpf9-0006M3-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HfpZm-0006ZJ-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HfpXD-0002lU-Kj; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:48:15 -0400 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69829 Archived-At: Would someone please debug this, then ack? ------- Start of forwarded message ------- X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org From: Stephen Berman Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:17:14 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: redisplay On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:47:19 -0400 Richard Stallman wrote: > (progn (new-frame) > (redisplay t) > (x-popup-dialog t '("Foo" ("Bar" . 1)))) > > I tried this but it didn't fail -- the new frame was not empty. In my Emacs (GNU Emacs 22.0.98.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.10.6) of 2007-04-20 on escher) I see two behaviors: 1. Evalling the above sexp in *scratch* with C-j or in any buffer with M-: results in what the OP reported: "produces a blank frame while the popup dialog is active, i.e., (redisplay t) fails to wait for redisplay to finish." 2. Evalling the sexp with C-x C-e in any buffer results in what RMS reported. Steve Berman _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug ------- End of forwarded message -------