From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Changes to hi-lock before release.
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:47:42 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HfpWg-0002gp-3s@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <7wejmekgrd.fsf@ece.lsu.edu> <E1HfGbN-0006PL-IH@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87zm51ab0b.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1HfQDr-0001nc-TX@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<873b2tjfdn.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177300231 29052 80.91.229.12 (23 Apr 2007 03:50:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:50:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: koppel@ece.lsu.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 23 05:50:26 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HfpZK-0000Fc-Bm
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 05:50:26 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hfpeg-00060f-AT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:55:58 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hfped-00060Y-GQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:55:55 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hfpec-00060G-HR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:55:55 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hfpec-000607-9S
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:55:54 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HfpZF-0006SC-Ln
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:50:21 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HfpWg-0002gp-3s; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:47:42 -0400
In-reply-to: <873b2tjfdn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:45:56 -0400)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69824
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/69824>

    > I don't see it.  hi-lock-find-patterns takes no arguments
    > and it never bypasses checking hi-lock-file-patterns-policy.
    > How does it distinguish explicit M-x calls from calls that come from hooks?

	  (when (and all-patterns
		     hi-lock-mode
		     (cond
		      ((eq this-command 'hi-lock-find-patterns) t)
		      ...

How does that distinguish explicit M-x calls from calls that come from
hooks?

If that really does work, then the text I wrote in the manual needs
correcting.  Can you correct it?