From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs manual mentioning thumbs mode but not tumme
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:47:11 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HfQER-0001tI-Vf@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMIEMIDAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177203070 10511 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2007 00:51:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:51:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: mathias.dahl@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 22 02:51:03 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HfQI9-0000yH-NC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:51:01 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfQNN-00048Z-Mv
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:56:25 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfQMF-0003Fj-GV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:55:15 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HfQME-0003FJ-V7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:55:14 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HfQME-0003FD-Hs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:55:14 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HfQGz-0005Ni-Vs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:49:50 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HfQER-0001tI-Vf; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:47:11 -0400
In-reply-to: <EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMIEMIDAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69758
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/69758>

I don't find your arguments entirely convincing for rejecting all
other names, but names that follows your ideas could be good ones.
I think of `browse-images' and `image-dired'.  The latter is better
since it is more specific.

We should rename tumme now, one way or another, before it is in a release.
Would someone please do this?