From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: print-circle and describe-variable Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:21:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4616EBD0.8020104@gmail.com> <4619903E.30608@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176179453 17588 80.91.229.12 (10 Apr 2007 04:30:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 10 06:30:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hb61A-0004rh-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:23:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hb652-00009Q-FL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hb64z-0008WC-AZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hb64y-0008Ue-Sb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hb64y-0008UO-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hb615-00018Q-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:23:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hb5yl-0004E5-KZ; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:21:07 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:25:27 -0400) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69254 Archived-At: Try (let ((print-circle t) (toto (list 2))) (prin1 (list toto toto))) In some cases, this is a good feature, but in many other cases it can be very confusing. That is a good point. So I guess it is better not to make this change. How about binding print-length and print-level instead? They could be bound to eval-expression-print-length, etc.