From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Please increase default value of message-log-max
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:31:24 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HaEl2-0007Rm-0c@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <c241693f0704061616xa604ce5ha5485f268e0eb2a3@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175968364 8939 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2007 17:52:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:52:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Jason Spiro <jasonspiro4@gmail.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: rgm@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 07 19:51:56 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HaEqU-0007L6-V6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:37:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HaEu7-00082B-2q
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:40:47 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HaEqw-0000Xl-UT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:37:31 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HaEqw-0000Vt-3V
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:37:30 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaEqv-0000VX-QO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:37:29 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HaEnJ-0001j7-2W
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:33:45 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HaEl2-0007Rm-0c; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 13:31:24 -0400
In-reply-to: <c241693f0704061616xa604ce5ha5485f268e0eb2a3@mail.gmail.com>
	(jasonspiro4@gmail.com)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69177
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/69177>

I am not sure I like the idea of setting message-log-max to 1024,
but setting it to 100 probably can't do any harm.
Does anyone see a problem in this?