From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:02:25 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HZ649-0002f8-VB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0702281427y48b034e7r1a80baffed362acb@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1HVyOM-0001Le-H0@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1HVzaL-0005qI-GV@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1HWEki-0007Bx-Lf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1HWM2F-0005P5-TL@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1HWwcA-0000bQ-L3@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvlkhgjai5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1HXOYv-0000nE-TI@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvodmatfpy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <umz1t7mlo.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1HXmsS-0000zY-Ea@fencepost.gnu.org> <uvegg6ba1.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1HY0ab-0006mw-LE@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvps6nx62r.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <4610139D.3060909@gnu.org>
	<E1HYCGj-0001Dn-AH@etlken.m17n.org> <utzvz56of.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1HYLhC-0002GR-T7@etlken.m17n.org> <46112BFB.7080109@gnu.org>
	<E1HYdj9-00072w-B9@fencepost.gnu.org> <u7ist6e91.fsf@gnu.org>
	<jwvlkh95wxh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175695626 27204 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2007 14:07:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:07:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 04 16:06:57 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HZ68G-0008VF-53
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:06:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HZ6BW-0004uX-8e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:10:02 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HZ69e-0003PY-Vs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:08:07 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HZ69e-0003PB-8e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:08:06 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ69e-0003P5-5g
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:08:06 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HZ66N-0006lg-9t
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:04:43 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HZ649-0002f8-VB; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:02:25 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwvlkh95wxh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:58:08 -0400)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69049
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/69049>

    3 - Stick to the older Emacs (i.e. presumably Emacs-22).

That is the bad consequence I want to avoid.