From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:46:51 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HYdj9-00072w-B9@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0702281427y48b034e7r1a80baffed362acb@mail.gmail.com>	<jwvwt1vzks9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1HQUEQ-0005iY-U8@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvk5xmv6sm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1HQvdW-0007G3-Ie@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HTACo-0003Q9-5f@fencepost.gnu.org>	<E1HTGvP-0005NP-UP@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HVgGK-00072z-KG@fencepost.gnu.org>	<!
	!	!	E1HVjWy-00068P-Ei@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HVyOM-0001Le-H0@fencepost.gnu.org>	<E1HVzaL-0005qI-GV@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HWEki-0007Bx-Lf@fencepost.gnu.org>	<E1HWM2F-0005P5-TL@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HWwcA-0000bQ-L3@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvlkhgjai5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1HXOYv-0000nE-TI@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvodmatfpy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<umz1t7mlo.fsf@gnu.org>	<E1HXmsS-0000zY-Ea@fencepost.gnu.org>	<uvegg6ba1.fsf@gnu.org>	<E1HY0ab-0006mw-LE@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvps6nx62r.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<4610139D.3060909@gnu.org>
	<E1HYCGj-0001Dn-AH@etlken.m17n.org> <utzvz56of.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1HYLhC-0002GR-T7@etlken.m17n.org> <46112BFB.7080109@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175586646 27524 80.91.229.12 (3 Apr 2007 07:50:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 07:50:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, handa@m17n.org
To: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 03 09:50:36 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HYdmg-0000pi-BK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:50:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HYdpn-0005Io-27
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:53:43 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HYdoc-0003xT-7L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:52:30 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HYdoa-0003wO-3M
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:52:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYdoY-0003vw-W0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:52:27 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HYdlQ-00066q-It
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:49:12 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HYdj9-00072w-B9; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:46:51 -0400
In-reply-to: <46112BFB.7080109@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Mon, 02
	Apr 2007 17:14:51 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68966
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/68966>

Lots of people in poor countries run versions of Windows prior to XP.
XP has activation features that cause trouble for them.

Whether this means they run Windows 98 or Windows ME, I don't know.
I don't remember all the versions of Windows; was there one in between
ME and XP?

We do not want to encourage them to upgrade.