From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:59:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175436113 24068 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2007 14:01:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 01 16:01:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HY0cq-0001Sw-JR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:01:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HY0fl-0007xC-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:04:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HY0fh-0007wx-VY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HY0fh-0007vt-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:04:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HY0fh-0007vP-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:04:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HY0cl-0003hl-7S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:01:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HY0ab-0006mw-LE; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:59:25 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 06:09:26 +0300) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68884 Archived-At: > You are asking for a rush to a decision, based on surmises. That Kenichi said it was not easy isn't a surmise: it's a fact. It looks like there are lots of directions to explore. Past experience leads me to suspect that only some of them have been considered. If they are all difficult, another direction not yet considered might be easier.