From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 09:59:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1HY0ab-0006mw-LE@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uvegg6ba1.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 06:09:26 +0300)
> You are asking for a rush to a decision, based on surmises.
That Kenichi said it was not easy isn't a surmise: it's a fact.
It looks like there are lots of directions to explore.
Past experience leads me to suspect that only some of them
have been considered. If they are all difficult, another
direction not yet considered might be easier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-01 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-28 22:27 kbd vs read-key-sequence Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-28 22:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-28 22:50 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-02-28 23:32 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 1:35 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 5:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 12:48 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 15:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 17:30 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-01 23:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 23:53 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 0:03 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 9:09 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-02 9:48 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 16:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-02 17:29 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 17:57 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-02 18:15 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 18:20 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-02 21:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-03 0:31 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-03 22:13 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-03 23:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-05 2:55 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-05 17:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-11 20:01 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-12 15:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-13 1:17 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-13 3:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-13 4:06 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-13 14:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-19 5:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-19 12:25 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-19 14:19 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-03-26 3:52 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-26 7:22 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-26 23:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-27 0:30 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-27 16:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 0:29 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-29 15:32 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-29 16:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-30 21:23 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 0:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-31 10:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 23:20 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-01 3:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-01 13:59 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2007-04-01 19:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-01 20:18 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-01 20:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-02 12:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 2:27 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-04-02 11:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 12:31 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-04-02 12:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-02 14:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-02 16:14 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-02 23:24 ` Davis Herring
2007-04-03 6:58 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-03 7:46 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 8:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 14:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-03 15:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 17:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-03 18:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 18:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 9:05 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-03 9:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-03 10:24 ` Jason Rumney
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-03 10:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-04-04 14:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-04-04 18:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 20:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 21:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 22:06 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-30 0:47 ` Kenichi Handa
2007-03-30 3:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-31 10:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-31 20:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-30 21:22 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-31 10:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-19 5:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-26 23:14 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 0:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-28 16:09 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-28 19:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-29 17:59 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-30 23:47 ` Chong Yidong
2007-03-31 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-03 22:13 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-02 18:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-02 19:04 ` Jason Rumney
2007-03-03 10:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1HY0ab-0006mw-LE@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=handa@m17n.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).