From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:20:56 -0400
Message-ID: <E1HXmsS-0000zY-Ea@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0702281427y48b034e7r1a80baffed362acb@mail.gmail.com>
	<f7ccd24b0703021015y53601c6bhd9d477ee0df820b2@mail.gmail.com>
	<jwvtzx3fjh3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1HNcTx-0004Xa-8w@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvslcmc5it.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1HO3MK-0002j0-28@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvwt1vzks9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1HQUEQ-0005iY-U8@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvk5xmv6sm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1HQvdW-0007G3-Ie@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1HTACo-0003Q9-5f@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1HTGvP-0005NP-UP@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1HVgGK-00072z-KG@fencepost.gnu.org> <! ! !
	E1HVjWy-00068P-Ei@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1HVyOM-0001Le-H0@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1HVzaL-0005qI-GV@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1HWEki-0007Bx-Lf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1HWM2F-0005P5-TL@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1HWwcA-0000bQ-L3@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvlkhgjai5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1HXOYv-0000nE-TI@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvodmatfpy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <umz1t7mlo.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175383453 24006 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2007 23:24:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:24:13 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	handa@m17n.org, jasonr@gnu.org
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 01 01:24:11 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HXmvb-00088z-3t
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 01:24:11 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HXmyR-0003rR-TZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:27:07 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HXmxT-0003Ie-Vw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:26:08 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HXmxT-0003IC-Dl
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:26:07 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXmxT-0003I7-5P
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:26:07 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HXmub-0002hY-Ng
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:23:09 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HXmsS-0000zY-Ea; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:20:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <umz1t7mlo.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 31
	Mar 2007 13:07:15 +0300)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68866
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/68866>

    On top of this, if Kenichi says that it wouldn't be easy, I submit
    that it shouldn't be done at all before the release.

You are asking for a rush to a decision, based on surmises.
That is the wrong way to handle a problem.  I want to understand
what is happening.