From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [DIFFS] Re: Connection to emacs CVS broken ? Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:18:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86wt1kw5rp.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <4k8xdziuwz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k5xi45h5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17913.45372.941749.353301@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45F9C5E8.1010700@gnu.org> <87ps7am73r.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <17913.59348.720489.675967@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87y7lxde4n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17915.12908.552882.130536@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87slc4lnd5.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <17915.30210.169435.644550@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174220465 2317 80.91.229.12 (18 Mar 2007 12:21:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:21:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org To: Nick Roberts Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 18 13:20:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HSuNY-0000fJ-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:20:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HSuOu-0000wV-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:22:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HSuOq-0000wM-Oa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:22:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HSuOp-0000wA-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:22:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HSuOp-0000w7-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 07:22:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HSuNU-0001ap-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:20:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HSuLV-0005PI-F6; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:18:45 -0400 In-reply-to: <17915.30210.169435.644550@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:00:50 +1300) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68050 Archived-At: > We are suggesting _replacing_ the ,v files en-mass, which is most > certainly safe; why do you think otherwise? If you're replacing them en-mass why is Richard asking someone to write a scriptwhich can be used to determine the difference between two ,v files, as a set of commits plus their log entries? This is called exploring more than one option in parallel.