From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest? Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:38:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87slcf8qxr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20070309135920.GA3560@kobe.laptop> <87hcsuwk6w.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87hcso2akn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173922841 25914 80.91.229.12 (15 Mar 2007 01:40:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 15 02:40:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HRexF-0006Fo-Qr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:40:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HReyC-00005Y-DH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:41:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HRey9-00005N-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:41:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HRey8-000056-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRey8-000053-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:41:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HRexB-0007wA-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:40:29 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HRevM-0006dO-2I; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:38:36 -0400 In-reply-to: <87hcso2akn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:56:08 -0400) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67948 Archived-At: > It should display that buffer in another window, and not abort > anything. That might means the new buffer will not be immediately available for editing, until the user cancels the minibuffer or isearch. That is right. The user will see the other buffer appear, and can either finish or cancel the command that is in progress. I think that is less harsh.