From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:24:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <45F59395.4010708@gnu.org> <45F5A2B4.7090301@gnu.org> <85ejnumf1o.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <868xe11tzu.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173842825 13696 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2007 03:27:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, sds@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 14 04:26:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HRK8g-0003c8-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:26:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRK9W-0006UJ-17 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:27:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HRK8Y-00060g-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:26:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HRK8Y-00060E-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:26:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRK8X-000608-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:26:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HRK7h-0004Qe-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:25:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HRK5s-0007AD-09; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:24:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <868xe11tzu.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:29:41 +0100) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67886 Archived-At: Again: I don't see that this guaranteed one signal per child, and you did not explain how it could. One signal per child? I seem to recall hearing of a similar project. Can the system deliver this signal for only $100?