From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Pretest?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:26:22 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HPmbW-0000Va-CU@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0703070221450.7736-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
	<87slcf8qxr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20070309135920.GA3560@kobe.laptop>
	<87hcsuwk6w.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173475822 18331 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2007 21:30:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:30:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 09 22:30:16 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HPmfB-0006j3-CL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:30:11 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HPmfT-0006LO-VR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:30:28 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HPmdo-0004Rm-TW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:28:45 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HPmdn-0004Pi-5T
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:28:43 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HPmdm-0004P8-RZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:28:42 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1HPmdP-0000dE-MR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:28:19 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HPmbW-0000Va-CU; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:26:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <87hcsuwk6w.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:44:23 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67651
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67651>

    I would like to suggest issuing a pretest on Monday the 12th.  What do
    people think?

Sounds good to me.