From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: `key-binding' and XEmacs-style events
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:14:25 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HMgQj-0003Kd-Oh@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <36817.128.165.123.18.1172703473.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172737115 442 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2007 08:18:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:18:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: herring@lanl.gov
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 01 09:18:10 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HMgTL-0004dq-AA
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:17:07 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMgTM-0002wr-LM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:17:08 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMgSc-0002Ya-1m
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:16:22 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMgSb-0002Y3-DX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:16:21 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMgSb-0002Xw-2v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:16:21 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMgSa-0001vk-RC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:16:20 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HMgQj-0003Kd-Oh; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:14:25 -0500
In-reply-to: <36817.128.165.123.18.1172703473.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov>
	(herring@lanl.gov)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67110
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67110>

    Obviously (key-binding [?a]) works just as well, but in order to write
    code that flexibly manipulates keystrokes it would be nice if the XEmacs
    syntax could always be used even in degenerate cases.

I agree.  Would someone please fix this and ack?