From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [lennart.borgman@gmail.com: Re: map-y-or-n does not use
	minibuffer-prompt face]
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:37:46 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HMEhO-00052g-74@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1HLWWP-0005I6-UG@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3y7mlxliq.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<E1HLwv2-0001pp-BT@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3irdnj4uc.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172630459 30048 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2007 02:40:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:40:59 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 03:40:50 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HMEkM-0006va-3W
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:40:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMEkM-0007sX-6L
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:40:50 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMEix-0007Ld-57
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:23 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMEiw-0007LG-OM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:22 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMEiw-0007LB-FW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:22 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMEiw-00056w-7d
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:22 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HMEhO-00052g-74; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:37:46 -0500
In-reply-to: <m3irdnj4uc.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66985
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66985>

    To easier see the impact of this, I set the bold attribute on the
    minibuffer-prompt face -- actually quite nice effect IMO.  It makes
    the _questions_ in the minibuffer stand out from ordinary _messages_
    in the echo area.

    With this setting, it seems rather odd that SOME questions are
    asked in the minibuffer-prompt face, and other are not.

That is a good argument.

Please fix the other questions to use minibuffer-prompt.