From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:37:32 -0500
Message-ID: <E1HMEhA-00050a-Ok@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<E1HLWWC-0005Fu-Hq@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvy7mlsens.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1HLlu0-0006gw-Dz@fencepost.gnu.org> <85ps7wovzt.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172630398 29866 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2007 02:39:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:39:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 03:39:51 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HMEjP-0006Tj-Cl
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:39:51 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMEjP-0007W7-Fc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:51 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMEik-0007FW-0v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:10 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HMEij-0007FE-9u
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:09 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMEij-0007F7-3b
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:09 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMEii-00053u-Sf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:39:08 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1HMEhA-00050a-Ok; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:37:32 -0500
In-reply-to: <85ps7wovzt.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:17:10 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66983
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66983>

    Well, if they _are_ an annoyance, then presumably because of
    problematic font lock patterns, and then they will be an annoyance
    also using stealth fontification (namely causing high CPU drain and
    sluggish behavior), only a non-debuggable, non-deterministic and
    non-reproduceable annoyance.

Does everyone agree that substantial delays result only from
problematic font lock patterns?  If so, I agree your conclusion
follows.