From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fix needed for communication with gpg-agent Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:38:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87irdzs6pp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fy91g1pl.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87wt2dk2rv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <873b4yt7xx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ps82ukz8.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <87slcynii0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87bqjivxrz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878xelkydk.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172562119 9371 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 07:41:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 07:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, cyd@stupidchicken.com, ueno@unixuser.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org To: Werner Koch Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 08:41:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLwy7-0007N2-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:41:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLwy7-00035N-FH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:41:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLwwg-0002X5-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:40:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLwwf-0002Wf-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:40:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLwwf-0002WU-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:40:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLwwf-000382-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:40:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HLwv5-0001q6-2b; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:38:43 -0500 In-reply-to: <878xelkydk.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> (message from Werner Koch on Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:27:03 +0100) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66902 Archived-At: > If so, does turning off caching prevent THAT problem? Not really. If someone is able to enter commands in Emacs, he will also be able to read the memory of all user processes and thus find cached passphrases. I do not understand this response. How can anyone find cached passphrases if caching is turned off?