From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:53:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85vehpwfrh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172519775 23202 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 19:56:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 20:56:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLlwu-0003uZ-62 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:55:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLlwt-0000yK-Pp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:55:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLlvj-0000eO-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLlvi-0000e1-9e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:54:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLlvi-0000dm-39 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:54:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLlvh-00077M-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HLluB-0006j5-54; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:53:03 -0500 In-reply-to: <85vehpwfrh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:16:02 +0100) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66872 Archived-At: > Regardless of the system load: the load may be low at the moment > _exactly_ because the user terminated all processes that would disturb > the interactivity of his current work, and I think it a mistake that > Emacs considers the CPU fit for grabbing for its own purposes unless > the user _explicitly_ asked for it. > > Stealth fontification is intended to stop whenever the user types a > character. So why would it interfere with the "interactivity" of > Emacs commands? Who is talking about the interactivity of Emacs? The first paragraph cited seems to suggest that.